Freedom Day

It is impossible to reflect back on 27 April 1994 without reminiscing about the legend that is former President Nelson Mandela.

Read Mandela`s statement after voting in South Africa`s First Democratic Election here: http://www.anc.org.za/show.php?id=3657

A few of our all-time favourite quotes:

“Many people have been sceptical of our capacity to realise the ideal of a rainbow nation. It is true that South Africa was often brought to the brink of destruction because of differences. But let us re-affirm this one thing here today: it is not our diversity which divides us, it is not our ethnicity, or religion or culture that divides us. Since we have achieved our freedom, there can only be one division amongst us: between those who cherish democracy and those who do not!” Nelson Mandela, speech on receiving The Freedom of Durban, Durban, South Africa, 16 April 1999

“The very fact that racism degrades both the perpetrator and the victim commands that, if we are true to our commitment to protect human dignity, we fight on until victory is achieved.” Nelson Mandela, address to The United Nations General Assembly, New York, USA, 3 October 1994

“… we know that peace is the most powerful weapon that any community or nation can have for development. As we rebuild our country, we should remain vigilant against the enemies of development and democracy, even if they come from within our own ranks. Violence will not bring us closer to our objectives. All of us should ask ourselves the question: Have I done everything in my power to bring about lasting peace and prosperity in my city and my country?” Nelson Mandela, speech on receiving The Freedom of Durban, Durban, South Africa, 16 April 1999

We wish you a cheerful Freedom Day 2016.

Yours faithfully,

Legal Hero.

Responsibilities towards a domestic worker

A Sectoral Determination issued by the Department of Labour for 1 December 2015 - 30 November 2016:

Note: if you are not listed in Area A, you fall under Area B. 

Screenshot/ photo cred: www.labour.gov.za

Notes:

As a Legal Hero policyholder, we can assist with a tailored domestic worker contract, salary slips and advise as to which other documents should form part of your file. Contact us today.

Yours faithfully,

Legal Hero

www.legalhero.co.za
0861 22 99 22
join@legalhero.co.za/ legal@legalhero.co.za/ admin@legalhero.co.za

#Arrest101

An arrest often happens when you least expect it. Sometimes, in less serious cases, you are granted Police Bail. This is when you may leave the Police Station’s holding cell, go home and then return for the Court appearance.

However, sometimes what is required is a formal bail application in Court. This is when you need to remain in the holding cell and wait for your Court appearance (must happen within 48 Court hours).

Just this morning one of our Policyholders appeared in Court following his arrest on Sunday (yesterday). The Legal Hero Policyholder luckily remembered to contact our 24/7 bail line. This morning his Attorney - paid for by Legal Hero at no extra charge/ no excess fee to him - attended to his formal bail hearing in Court and managed to have all charges against our Policyholder withdrawn by virtue of mediation entered into with the State.

Depending on certain factors such as the type of charge involved (the seriousness thereof) and whether the accused has committed any previous convictions, the State is inclined to extend a “helping hand” to an accused who has strayed by referring criminal charges for mediation. This is in an attempt to resolve the matter in an amicable manner between the accused and complainant. However, should the accused try to misuse or make a mockery of the State’s kindness, mediation will not be offered and the case will run its normal course.

Have a great day!

Legal Hero 

www.legalhero.co.za

Muslim Marriage

“The new constitutional order is based on the recognition of our diversity and tolerance for other religious faiths.” - Daniels v Campbell and Others 2004 (5) SA 331 (CC) para 54.

Prior to our progressive and tolerant constitution, marriage was an option available only between a man and a woman in terms of the Marriage Act of 1961. Today same-sex couples may marry in terms of the Civil Union Act of 2006 and the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act of 1998 allows for African customary marriages.

South Africa has yet to enact legislation (law) that specifically caters for Muslim marriage.

Luckily there have been a few positive strides: 

• There are instances where our law does in fact recognize a Muslim marriage to a certain degree in order to offer protection. For example, only a ‘spouse’ can apply for maintenance from the deceased estate of their loved one after his/ her passing. To be considered a surviving ‘spouse’ in terms the Maintenance of Surviving Spouses Act, your marriage must, however, be legally recognized and therefore valid in South Africa. In the Constitutional Court case quoted above, the surviving wife (married in terms of Muslim law) was acknowledged as a ‘spouse' and in the court case of Hassan v Jacobs the surviving spouse of a polygamous Muslim marriage was also accepted as a surviving ‘spouse.' 

• The Muslim Marriages Bill is a draft law that was compiled back in 2003. This Bill has, however, been subject to much criticism. For example, it states that Muslim Marriages will automatically be OUT of community of property unless parties enter into an ante-nuptial agreement stating otherwise. In terms of South Africa’s other marriage laws mentioned above, a marriage will automatically be IN community of property. Being married IN community of property often offers protection to a spouse who gives up his/ her career and opportunities to stay at home and take care of the children. Should the couple divorce, parties married IN community of property will split everything fifty-fifty. 

• A few years ago Imams (Muslim clerics) were trained and appointed as authorized marriage officers, enabling a Muslim marriage to be solemnized by a registered Imam marriage officer in terms of the Marriage Act. Whilst the aforementioned is great news, many questions still remain unanswered pending the enactment of the Muslim Marriage Bill to deal specifically with many rights, responsibilities and consequences of a Muslim marriage. 

The point of having a specific act (law) such as the Marriage Act, Civil Union Act and the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act, is to offer case sensitive regulation and protection. 

Without a specific act, many questions that arise include the logistics and rights when it comes to the resolution of the marriage, for example. There are also a few other concerns regarding Islam law which have been cited as reasons why the enactment of the Bill is dragging its feet, including the man’s exclusive right to end the marriage unilaterally (talaq) and the custom that a woman may be wed by proxy.

“Everyone has the right to freedom of conscience, religion, thought, belief and opinion… This section does not prevent legislation recognizing… marriages concluded under any tradition, or a system of religious, personal or family law… Recognition… must be consistent with this section and the other provisions of the Constitution.” – Section 15(1), 15(a)(i) and 15(3)(b) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996

We wish you a wonderful and thought-provoking Heritage Month. South Africa's rich diversity of religious communities, cultures, languages and customs have a great deal to offer. As the preamble to our Constitution asks, may we all live ‘united in our diversity.’

www.legalhero.co.za

Not married but together for 30 years. What are my rights?

Good morning 

I really need your advice. I have been living with a man for 30 years. We are not married but I found out that he has been having an affair for 3 years. I am going to leave him but please will you tell me what my rights are. 

When we met in I had a house and a car. I did not use my Volkswagen so he used it. He used my car and a year later we sold it and bought him a new car. We also sold my house a few years later and used that to buy a bigger house. This was about twenty years ago. The new house and cars that followed after that are all in his name. I left my job many years ago to take care of my children and he supported us. My two daughters are not his. 

I do all the homework myself, cooking, cleaning, also do the garden, massage his shoulders every night, wash cars, varnishing of the house. My children have left the house but I don’t know what my next step should be. This is not easy. 

Dear Women’s Month Reader 

We are terribly sorry to learn of your predicament. This is a very tricky situation seeing that there is a big gap in South African law when it comes to long term relationships – where both parties contributed to the common household, but on paper only one party holds all the funds. 

Without a valid Marriage, Civil Union (similar to a Marriage) or Universal Agreement, your cohabitation with this man is not expressly recognised in law/ legislation. 

Your options here include: 

a) Prove an implied Universal/ Partnership Agreement in Court: 

- There is a Domestic Partnership Bill (this law has not been enacted/ become operational as yet) which may offer future protection to persons in a similar situation. So, the good news is that the legislators have realised that there is in fact a big shortcoming regarding long term cohabitants. Unfortunately, this new law is dragging its feet and implementation is unfortunately not around the corner.

- HOWEVER, there has been a handful of court cases where one of the cohabitants were able to prove an implied Universal Partnership. This is extremely difficult to prove, and most unfortunately fail. 

- To prove an implied Partnership Agreement, you need to prove that you both contributed to the household/ domestic partnership enterprise and that both parties aimed to make a profit and enjoy the benefits of a growing domestic partnership enterprise. Your lengthy time together will also play a role. Cooking, cleaning, massaging, etc. also count as household contributions.

- Just to highlight a specific case in terms of which the woman was successful in proving an implied Domestic Partnership (and in her case they were together for ten years less than you and your partner, i.e. 20 years): although both contributed to the same extent, as it was claimed, the woman walked away with only 30% of the partnership enterprise’s value.

- This could be a lengthy and tiresome court experience. We note that you are not a Legal Hero policyholder, but we might be able to recommend an excellent attorney in your area. 

b) Better yet, try to mediate the matter: 

- It could be that your partner is willing to settle out of court and award you a fair percentage of the common household considering all your contributions. This would spare you the expense of going to court and one could split the household depending on what is fair to both parties. An agreement could be drawn up for both of you to sign and abide by.

c) Claim monies of the past three years: 

- A Civil claim (your partner owing you money) prescribes in three years’ time. In other words, if you loaned your partner money/ assets/ etc., he would be able to raise the special defense of prescription in court regarding debts older than three years. At this point in time, you would only be able to claim back from your partner any and all expenses (that you are able to prove in writing) over the past three years.

- An acknowledgment and/ or an agreement to start paying the debts off (even if it’s only a small payment every month) will revive the debt!

- Just bear in mind that he who alleges, bears the burden of proof. You would also for example have to give an explanation as to why everything was registered in his name. 

What is a Domestic Partnership Agreement? It is a contract that sets out the legal implications of a committed and long term heterosexual or same sex couple who decide not to marry but wish to protect themselves against an unfortunate separation. More specifically, it sets out the assets and properties of each of the parties and what were to happen should the relationship turn sour. 

Should you and your partner decide to get back together, or you wish to cohabit with another person, please consider entering into a Domestic Partnership Agreement. It has your best legal interests at heart and can save you from all the admin and legal uncertainties you are currently facing. 

This is a lot to take in. Please consider your options carefully and do not hesitate to ask follow-up questions. 

Kind regards, 

Legal Hero

www.legalhero.co.za 

Here's to strong women

“You strike a woman, you strike a rock!” 

– Women’s March (9 August 1956) resistance song. The march was in protest of the pass laws restricting black men from entering the cities. Women from all races joined forces and marched to the Pretoria Union Building to hand over a petition. 

Fifty nine years later there remains an uncomfortable amount of reasons for South African women to join forces and march once more. 

Every six hours a woman gets killed by her intimate partner. Women are raped, abused and humiliated on a daily basis. Many households are headed by women - women who continue to earn significantly less than their male counterparts. So yes, the struggle to emancipate women is real and far from over.

It is true that we have come a long way. In ancient times a woman was regarded as the property of her father or husband and was unable to enter into a contract without a man’s consent. Isn’t it heartbreaking to note that in some households, not much has changed? More than 50% of women surveyed by the World Health Organization in 2013 have been abused verbally or emotionally. Most women unfortunately suffer in silence, fearing retaliation or self-blame. 

If you or someone you know is a victim of stalking, physical, economical, verbal and/ or emotional abuse, we urge you to please follow or pass on these simple steps to obtain a protection order: click here. 

The government is trying to relieve woman and child abuse by implementing Family Violence, Child Protection and Sexual Offenses units countrywide. On the 22nd of July 2015 the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services also officially opened the Schweizer Reneke Sexual Offences Court in the North West Province– a court with specially trained officials and equipment that will assist to reduce any chance of secondary trauma for victims of sexual violence. These are all strides in the right direction, however, there is a potential force much stronger than Parliament: all women joining forces. 

It is easy to sit back and blame decades of gender discrimination, especially as the damage caused is unacceptable and has bred mindsets that are not compatible with equal opportunities and respect. As a woman I believe it is time for us all to take a hard look in the mirror. Are you living a fulfilled life? Is this who you dreamed of becoming as a little girl? Are you spending more time belittling women than actively building each other up? Is that petty fight with that other struggling woman really worth it? 

Women form more than half of this beautiful country’s population. Imagine what we can accomplish together.

In celebration of Women’s Month, Legal Hero will upload a few Woman Law 101 notes to try ensure that no legal obstacle is stopping you from reaching your full potential. Please mail social@legalhero.co.za should you have any specific topics or questions you would like one of our legal wonder women to address.

“Here's to strong women. May we know them, may we be them, may we raise them.” - Unknown.

Your School's Uniform and Dress Code

The Federal Constitutional Court (Germany) declared a ban on teachers wearing Islamic headscarves unconstitutional on Friday, 13 March 2015.

The decision reminds us of the South African Constitutional Court case of a few years ago: MEC for Education v Pillay 2008. Yes, South Africa has one of the best constitutions in the world.

With Human Rights Day around the corner (21st of March), let's have a look at the Pillay case... 

It could therefore be within a learner’s right to wear a nose stud to school if it forms part of the learner's religion or culture. Schools are thus advised to allow for a procedure in terms of which a learner can apply to wear a religious or cultural piece. According to the Pillay case, the fact that an exemption might encourage more learners to express their religion or culture, should be celebrated and not feared.

Proudly South African.

www.legalhero.co.za 

Know Your Socio-economic Rights!

Socio-economic Rights include the right to adequate housing, food, health services and water. In other words, these rights are basic essentials necessary to survive. 

It differs from Civil and Political rights (the right to vote, freedom of speech, equality, etc.) necessary to lead a full life.

Our Human Rights (both Civil/ Political and Socio-economic) are found in Chapter Two of our Constitution, the Bill of Rights. The wording of our Constitution qualifies certain Socio-economic Rights. 

Socio-economic rights can be qualified or unqualified 

· Qualified: 

- Only if the State (Government) has sufficient resources to fulfil the right;

- The State will make these rights available within its means/ depending on its budget/ ‘within available resources.'

· Unqualified: 

- The State has a duty to make these rights available; 

- This does not mean the State must make these rights available immediately or without delay (according to the Constitutional Court).

Human right violations: 

Speak to your hero/ attorney. Alternatively, you may contact the South African Human Rights Commission at complaints@sahrc.org.za.

Note: non-nationals can also claim Socio-economic Rights. If you have a look at the wording used in the Bill of Rights, you'll notice the word 'everyone' is used in the socio-economic sections. Also, in the Khosa case of 2004, the Constitutional Court once again highlighted that non-nationals are a vulnerable group in our society and should be protected.

Other rights, however, such as the right to vote and access to land, use the word 'citizens.'

Wishing you a wonderful Friday and weekend, 

Legal Hero

www.legalhero.co.za 

Same Sex Marriages Introduction

Did you know? South Africa was the first country to proclaim:

a)      Sexual orientation as a human right in both its Interim (1993) and Final Constitution (1996);

b)      that discrimination based on sex, gender or sexual orientation was forbidden.

In spite of the above, the recognition of same-sex marriages only came much later as the South African Common Law (mixture of Roman Dutch and English Law) merely defined a marriage as "a union of one man with one woman, to the exclusion, while it lasts, of all others,” resulting in conflict and a direct contravention of Section 9 (the equality clause) of our Constitution.

It was not up until the lengthy and well renowned battle in Minister of Home Affairs and Another v Fourie and Another 2005, that the Common Law definition of marriage (and the marriage formula in the Marriage Act, to the extent that they excluded same-sex partners from marriage), was declared unfairly discriminatory and unjustifiable by the Constitutional Court. This judgment was handed down by nine justices, agreeing unanimously that the Common Law definition of marriage was unconstitutional and invalid. 

Wishing you a fantastic Friday and weekend ahead, 

Legal Hero. 

www.legalhero.co.za. 

Search Warrants

Question received

“The police came to my house and went through my things and looked under the carpet yesterday. I have nothing to hide so I let them come in but explain please how a police does get the right to come into my house? They found nothing and walked away.”

Reply

In order to fight and/ or prevent crime, South African Police Officers often need to invade our privacy. It is true that our Constitution enshrines our right to privacy (section 14) and human dignity (section 10).

However, we must remember that our Constitutional rights are not absolute in that it can be limited (section 36 of the Constitution) if, amongst a few other factors, the purpose of the limitation is important, reasonable and justifiable in an open and democratic society.

South African Police Officers have a duty to try and protect us. According to section 205 of our Constitution:

“The objects of the police service are to prevent, combat and investigate crime, to maintain public order, to protect and secure the inhabitants of the Republic and their property, and to uphold and enforce the law.”

The abovementioned goals of the Police would be difficult without the right to search for items that form part of, or are suspected of forming part of, a crime. Seeing as the penalty for committed crimes relies on the decision of a court based on evidence available, it is important that the Police conduct searches if they have reasonable grounds to believe that evidence may be hidden in a house. This is to ensure a safer community and life for all in our beautiful country.

However, the right to the State/ Police to search our homes is also not absolute. This right is regulated and limited in terms of the Criminal Procedure Act. What does the Criminal Procedure Act have to say about a Police Officer searching your home?

· The Police Officer should show you his/her search warrant that was issued by a magistrate or justice of peace;

· A magistrate, justice of peace or presiding officer at criminal proceedings will only grant a search warrant if there are reasonable grounds for believing that the item (connected to a suspected crime) is at a certain home;

· This search warrant allows a Police Officer to search a person, the home of a person and to take the item in question from the person;

· Police officers must search the person and / or the person’s home during the day and not at night, unless the search warrant explicitly gives the officer the right to search at night.


Only in a few circumstances may an officer search your house WITHOUT a warrant:

a) If you consent to the search and the officer removing the item;

b) If the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that a search warrant will be issued;

c) Or if the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that first obtaining a search warrant would cause a delay & lead to the item’s disappearance.

In your case you gave the Police Officers consent to enter your home, it was therefore not necessary for the Police to first obtain a search warrant. The Police must show you a search warrant if they have one but remember that the Police may also enter without one if it is urgent and in the interests of justice to not delay the search, as explained above.

When shown a search warrant, please take care to read it. The warrant may not be too general or vague but rather specific in what its aim is. This was repeatedly said in the case of Powel v Waja, which also highlighted the fact that one may challenge the validity of a search and/ or a search warrant in court. Remember that you can question the search by contacting the relevant Police Station and asking to speak to the Station Commander. It is therefore important that you request the full name and rank of the Police Officer/s searching your home.

We hope this clears matters up a bit.


Wishing you a great day,

Legal Hero.

www.legalhero.co.za