Tell me more about Customary Law

Many cultures and customs exist under our gorgeous South African sky. Long before the British and Roman Dutch colonized the Cape, many unwritten laws governed the lands and its people.

It is, however, important to note that it is not always an easy task to apply customary law in court. Customary law is a living and (mostly) unwritten law passed on from generation to generation.

Tell me more about customary law?

· ‘Customary law’ is defined as ‘the customs and usages traditionally observed among indigenous African peoples of South Africa and which form part of the culture of those peoples’ (The Recognition of Customary Marriages Act 120 of 1998).

· Customary law is binding in South Africa provided it is not ‘exercised in a manner inconsistent with any provision of the Bill of Rights’ (Section 31 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996).

· African customary law is not a singular code, but encompasses many different communities and cultures such as Xitsonga customary law, Zulu customary law, Xhosa customary law, etc.

· Most disputes are settled in family or clan meetings and do not reach the western courts. Our Constitution furthermore provides for customary courts and traditional leadership in section 211. Customary courts are mainly found within the rural areas and are headed by Chiefs and Headmen. Customary law, Ubuntu and the rules of the community, subject to our Constitution, applies in customary courts.

· Western courts are extremely cautious when applying and ruling customary law. This is mostly due to a lack of information/ understanding, their common law training and the binding impact the judgment may have. As pointed out by many judges, customary law should be allowed enough space to develop at its own pace. This is why most judges treat customary law cases before them on a piecemeal basis – in other words, their judgement only affects a certain issue, current parties or only a specific community.

· Many argue that the polygamous nature of customary law is unconstitutional in that customary law allows for a man to have more than one wife but a women may not marry more than one man. The Recognition of Customary Marriages Act tries to offer relief via section 6, noting a wife’s equal status and capacity ‘to acquire assets and to dispose of them, to enter into contracts and to litigate, in addition to any rights and powers she may have in customary law.’

· Furthermore, a husband needs to apply to court for approval before he can marry a second wife in terms of customary law. The previous wife/ wives need to be added to the court proceedings. In a sense the previous wives therefore need to give their permission. Also, this court order will determine the consequences of the marriage concerning the matrimonial property regime (assets and liabilities between the parties).

· Customary marriages need to be registered at the Department Of Home Affairs within three months. However, not registering the customary marriage does not make it invalid. Unless the husband marries a second wife in terms of customary law. If there is only one man and one woman, the parties may get married in terms of civil and customary law. Once married in terms of civil law, the man may not marry more than one wife (unless the parties divorce in terms of civil law).

· The requirements for a valid customary marriage include: consent, majority age and the rituals in terms of customary law (note that the paying of lobola is not a requirement for a valid customary marriage). The default matrimonial property regime for the first customary marriage is in community of property.

We wish you and your family a celebratory Heritage Day tomorrow. May we all learn to properly ‘unite in our diversity.’

Today is also a Jewish holiday, Yom Kippur. Yom Kippur is a day of fasting and repentance to renew the relationship with God. 

Legal Hero

www.legalhero.co.za

Muslim Marriage

“The new constitutional order is based on the recognition of our diversity and tolerance for other religious faiths.” - Daniels v Campbell and Others 2004 (5) SA 331 (CC) para 54.

Prior to our progressive and tolerant constitution, marriage was an option available only between a man and a woman in terms of the Marriage Act of 1961. Today same-sex couples may marry in terms of the Civil Union Act of 2006 and the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act of 1998 allows for African customary marriages.

South Africa has yet to enact legislation (law) that specifically caters for Muslim marriage.

Luckily there have been a few positive strides: 

• There are instances where our law does in fact recognize a Muslim marriage to a certain degree in order to offer protection. For example, only a ‘spouse’ can apply for maintenance from the deceased estate of their loved one after his/ her passing. To be considered a surviving ‘spouse’ in terms the Maintenance of Surviving Spouses Act, your marriage must, however, be legally recognized and therefore valid in South Africa. In the Constitutional Court case quoted above, the surviving wife (married in terms of Muslim law) was acknowledged as a ‘spouse' and in the court case of Hassan v Jacobs the surviving spouse of a polygamous Muslim marriage was also accepted as a surviving ‘spouse.' 

• The Muslim Marriages Bill is a draft law that was compiled back in 2003. This Bill has, however, been subject to much criticism. For example, it states that Muslim Marriages will automatically be OUT of community of property unless parties enter into an ante-nuptial agreement stating otherwise. In terms of South Africa’s other marriage laws mentioned above, a marriage will automatically be IN community of property. Being married IN community of property often offers protection to a spouse who gives up his/ her career and opportunities to stay at home and take care of the children. Should the couple divorce, parties married IN community of property will split everything fifty-fifty. 

• A few years ago Imams (Muslim clerics) were trained and appointed as authorized marriage officers, enabling a Muslim marriage to be solemnized by a registered Imam marriage officer in terms of the Marriage Act. Whilst the aforementioned is great news, many questions still remain unanswered pending the enactment of the Muslim Marriage Bill to deal specifically with many rights, responsibilities and consequences of a Muslim marriage. 

The point of having a specific act (law) such as the Marriage Act, Civil Union Act and the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act, is to offer case sensitive regulation and protection. 

Without a specific act, many questions that arise include the logistics and rights when it comes to the resolution of the marriage, for example. There are also a few other concerns regarding Islam law which have been cited as reasons why the enactment of the Bill is dragging its feet, including the man’s exclusive right to end the marriage unilaterally (talaq) and the custom that a woman may be wed by proxy.

“Everyone has the right to freedom of conscience, religion, thought, belief and opinion… This section does not prevent legislation recognizing… marriages concluded under any tradition, or a system of religious, personal or family law… Recognition… must be consistent with this section and the other provisions of the Constitution.” – Section 15(1), 15(a)(i) and 15(3)(b) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996

We wish you a wonderful and thought-provoking Heritage Month. South Africa's rich diversity of religious communities, cultures, languages and customs have a great deal to offer. As the preamble to our Constitution asks, may we all live ‘united in our diversity.’

www.legalhero.co.za